Simple, Accurate, and Robust Projector-Camera Calibration

Motivation(s)

  • Does it solve the people problem i.e. a pain point for the world at large?

  • Does it solve the technical problem i.e. why doesn’t the people problem have a trivial solution or why are the previous solutions inadequate?

Proposed Solution(s)

  • Why is it believed that this solution will work?

  • Why is it better than previous solutions?

Evaluation(s)

  • What argument, implementation, and/or experiment makes the case for the value of the ideas?

  • What problems or benefits are identified?

Future Direction(s)

  • What ideas did you come up with while reading the paper?

Question(s)

  • What do you find confusing or difficult to understand?

Analysis

  • What are the main implications of the paper you would like to remember?

  • Is this a good idea?

  • How does it relate to other papers if any?

  • What flaws (e.g. assumptions, claims, methodology, interpretations of data) do you perceive?

  • What are the most interesting points?

  • What are the most controversial points?

  • Beyond the insights on the research question, what else could be valuable (e.g. ideas, software, techniques, survey)?

  • Is this really going to work in practice?

  • Who would want it?

  • What is needed to make this a reality?

  • When might this become a reality?

Notes

References

MT12

Daniel Moreno and Gabriel Taubin. Simple, accurate, and robust projector-camera calibration. In 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission (3DIMPVT), 2012 Second International Conference on, 464–471. IEEE, 2012.